![]() So, before I waste days research this topic, should i care about any of those? are them better than ext4 nowadays (that paper is from 2011)? Would i loose any functionality running those file systems as opposed to ext4 (e.g. Before you start the drive can be any filesystem (NTFS or FAT32). So in short: You do not need to chose any file system, nor format your drive the way you are doing it. but i know very little about them (my only other experience is with RO flash FS, which i use mostly for openWRT) and that paper makes considerations about the type of flash memory being used (i have no clue how to extract that information from my devices or from the manufacturer pages) iso file to FAT32 or NTFS formatted USB drive, you will NOT be able to boot from it. ![]() I found publications suggesting JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS. My usage pattern will be to almost never write to the disk, only on system updates. The only thing i did was to mount all the frequently-written to directories (e.g. i'm currently using ext4 and not giving any though about trim. I pretty much installed Fedora18 on a 16GB USB3 pen drive (it's faster then a harddrive). It includes the power and flexibility of Arch Linux without the complex setup and installation, but in a tiny Linux distro. ArchBang is essentially Arch Linux made easier and reduced in size. I'd like opinions on Read-Write usb images. ArchBang is based on Arch Linux and inspired by CrunchBang, another small Linux distro. Most other questions here close to this topic are either for SSDs, or ReadOnly usb live images. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |